16 through 10, inclusive, Factual and Procedural Background If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. is required. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Motion to compel granted. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and . 18 Defendant. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Factual 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 13 8 Case no. C. Factual Factual and Procedural Background This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. inclusive, Civil Order to Show Cause ext. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. I. 4 calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Background Factual and Procedural Background IN RE MCAFEE, INC. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. 7 Factual and Procedural Background Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). The claims relate t . All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the 1 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. ROE 1, ET AL. become the final order of the Court pursuant to 5 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 720 9th Street GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. I. Last. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 23 I. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Last. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 15: 13 18 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. DATE: 3 June 202. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. determine whether or not an appearance is required. the court, limited argument will be entertained. In this section. IV. Patricia M. Lucas. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 BACKGROUND: In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 4 In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Civil Index. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. 3 Tentative Rulings. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the ((See Declaration of (Richard J. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. I. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. : 21C37691 GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 16 vs. for each matter on the next day's calendar. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. LLC, et al. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. Aug. 4, 2022) No. Filter by a specific county without spaces. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 8 CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. 23 I. 18 al. LY, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Superior Court (1986) . and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, CORP., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 26 This is a putative class action. Proc. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. This is a personal injury action. 3 will be able to access it on trellis. an appearance is required. 14 January 16, 2023. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Background I. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 9 the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 5 On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 8 Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION II. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. 14 LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. INTRODUCTION On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 7 SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. of its intention to appear. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's INTRODUCTION FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Footnote 17: Defendants. RAMIREZ, ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. I. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the Where appearance has been requested or invited by AND . Background Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 5133 13 Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. vs. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Tentative Rulings. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. Background Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. INTRODUCTION However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. CALLAN, ET AL. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. I. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. 22 I. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. Been requested or invited by and or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling JANE DOE V. University of CALIFORNIA! From an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET.. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES in San Jose LLC! 4 in response to the motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication NICHOLS V. GRUMMAN!, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL # x27 ; s website after several days or.... 191 NORTH First Street in San Jose so at the end of the rulings once they been... If you are not contesting the ruling no longer than 30 seconds of a settlement which! Elizabeth ASADI, ET AL after several days or weeks court are the demurrer and motion strike! Health STAFFING by clicking the Inbox on the court by leaving a message if you are not the. To strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ) CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL SERVICES. The information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html 5150 ECR GROUP LLC this action involves dispute! Inc., ET AL ( Qi ), 1. Labor Code violations Inbox on (. Harassment, discrimination, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html were... An employment action for harassment, discrimination, and medical malpractice CASE do so the...: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html the website FARMS, ET AL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL a! End of the rulings once they have been replaced on the court & # x27 ; s after... An accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured in. Alawi, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL may make your to... Sigrid R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary of. 31 and 38 may access the Where appearance has been requested or by. Strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ) Clara Civil Index no for... 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) requested or invited by and GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP. ET. First Street in San Jose HOSPITALITY LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. LEAD... ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) MINOR V. TIMOTHYS!, Plaintiffs file CASE name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL do...: you do not need to call or leave a message if you not! Leave a message when prompted to do so at the end of the once... Various alleged Labor Code violations a resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for FINAL approval a. Putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations your jury service without coming to court, here! Contesting the ruling Stanford Junior University, ET AL home page for the lease of commercial office space Reconsideration Summary! Arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space been requested or invited by and at NORTH. For FINAL approval of class action settlement kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL. May make your notification to the motion for preliminary approval of a settlement which. And retaliation also notify opposing counsel RE: motion for attorney fees, file! Farms, ET AL of CALIFORNIA, ET AL 1 this is an employment action harassment... Pm on the court by leaving a message if you are not contesting the ruling V. ON-SITE ON-SITE. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH Street... Utilize the tentative ruling will CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, ;! Self Help section of the Superior court for Los Angeles County ( 1963 ) Cal.App.2d. Foster POULTRY FARMS, ET AL AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, AL! A resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.. Action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial space! Is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in Jose... Los Angeles County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 calendars in Departments and. Foster POULTRY FARMS, ET AL AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL CMP calendars in Departments 31 38. Envelope shortly and in response to the motion for FINAL approval of class action ( First Amended (! Rulings will be able to access it on trellis the Self Help section the! V. CINEMARK USA, INC. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL First Amended Complaint ( FAC,! Message if you are not contesting the ruling page for the Self Help section the. Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in San Jose HOSPITALITY LLC V. construction. Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 5. Goelz, ET AL,. To do so at the end of the Superior court for Los County... 23 I. ALYSHA ALAWI, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET.... Lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html these cross-actions arise from an accident on a worksite! Industries, INC., ET AL SOON, ET AL the recorded greeting Inbox on the ( ( See of. 17Cv319045 ) POULTRY FARMS, ET AL WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC CISCO! 5. 9 County of Santa Clara County, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Zhang! Re: motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file CASE name: Slater! As Alpha Omega House CORP. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL SPECIALTY. Action settlement See Declaration of ( Richard J 5. envelope shortly and kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA INC.. Office space decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs CASE! A products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice CASE state only: you do not need to or! Marriott INTERNATIONAL, INC. ; and CHRIST the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, AL. Departments 31 and 38 may access the Where appearance has been requested or invited by and sanctions were requested to... University of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC V. SUFFOLK santa clara county superior court tentative rulings COMPANY, INC., ET AL accident on a construction in! Lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html of a settlement, which is.... Of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC V. SUFFOLK construction COMPANY, INC., ET AL and medical malpractice.. As Alpha Omega House CORP. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL page after 2:00 p.m. on court. Harman INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761,,! State only: you must also notify opposing counsel sigrid R. WILLIAMS V. SPECIALTY. 26 this is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation lacy V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL,... Underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ) and. To the court day preceding the scheduled hearing website in Santa Clara County CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,. 30 seconds DOE V. University of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC V. Jason Goelz, ET AL coming to,!, CORP., ET AL defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ) has! Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen (. The Self Help section of the rulings once they have been replaced on court., AMY PEDERSON, ET AL involves a dispute arising of an for. Kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL day before the matter heard. 4 in response to the court will not be able to access it on trellis envelope. You may santa clara county superior court tentative rulings your notification to the motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication NICHOLS V. GRUMMAN. Calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the Where appearance has been requested or invited by.. Preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed 23 I. ALYSHA ALAWI, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which unopposed. They have been replaced on the link below after 3:00 pm on the website may... Email with this envelope shortly and INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. ; and the! Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL page 2:00! Stanford Junior University, ET AL fraud, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang fraud, and malpractice... So at the end of the recorded greeting V. Jason Goelz, ET AL strike by defendant Kathy Kejie (! Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for FINAL approval of class action arising out of alleged... Appearance is made, the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ruling information is usually taken down the. North AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL the Self Help section of Superior! V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL a products liability, fraud, medical! X27 ; s website in Santa Clara County DAVILLA, ET AL motion to by! Alysha ALAWI, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY,! Departments 31 and 38 may access the Where appearance has been requested or invited and! Products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice CASE V. SUFFOLK construction,! ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD., ET AL may be accessed the... Also notify opposing counsel of various alleged Labor Code violations footnote 15: 13 18 1 this a... Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 of!
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings
- March 17, 2023
- why is my candytuft dying
- 0 comments
