fomapan 400 vs hp5

News, Tips & Reviews. These films are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. Thank you. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. 2. Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. Very different animals. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). Glad you found it useful! If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Fomapan 200 suited me better. I am not sure that I agree with you on the contrast. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. Some people love it, some hate it. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. because theyre reliable and inexpensive. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. I dont do any kind of noise reduction or destructive editing I often dont even bother with spot removing bits of dust as these dont bother me unless they really distract from the image overall. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. Mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old. In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. Really glad you found it useful! Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. Find out more about 35mmc here. den APX400 kann ich uneingeschrnkt empfehlen. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. After acquiring a Minolta 16 spy camera, and a Goerz Minicord TLR, Ive had need for 16mm negative film to load and shoot in them. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. Thank you! But for some, $20 is a big deal. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. However due to my slow shooting style I didnt have these images ready in any kind of timeframe that would make sense, and have since shot a number of rolls of both, which has given me a little more to talk about. Find out more about 35mmc here. Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. Great article Simon! Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. JavaScript is disabled. You know what they basically said? Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. Noticeable halation. Fomapan 200, Im still trying to figure something out. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. This means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in my frame. Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. You are using an out of date browser. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". Largely, I think its because Ive never scored a deal on HP5+, but given that - HP5 is probably as grainy as the Fomapan 200 is, regardless of format, and despite being a true cubic grain film, it seems to resolve just about the same, with way way more flexibility in terms of processing options. ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. I'm open to any dispute. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Learn how your comment data is processed. You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. With some loaders there is no actual gate, just a labyrinth which prevents the light from entering more than an inch or so. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. An update here. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. The golden rule of film photography is to shoot for the shadows and develop for the highlights, however Id caution overexposing this film too much. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? aber eigentlich wird das nix. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. Great shots, Simon!Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. I love your city scenes. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Simon, These are great! Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. At any rate, nice shots. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. Cheers! je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. Some people love them; others cant stand them. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. Although these werent excessively Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. Ansel Adams did good tree work. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. Thanks for experimenting with this film so the rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results! Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. roll of Kentmere 400. Thank you Marius! Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. Lets face it: Shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors. I thankfully finally ran out of the 100ft. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. When shot with different exposures in mind, in different kinds of conditions, these films can produce quite a few looks. I think the character of these films are the elements that remain consistent through most use cases. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. These are terrific. Enter? I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. I think that these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. Happy shooting! So this post is very helpful many thanks. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. It has a unique feel and look. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. And believe me, they are crummy. und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. Bottom line: All three provide very similar results; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment. I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? Hvesterlos 1 yr. ago. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. The Professional's Source Since 1973 All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. Paste as plain text instead, Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. schrfe war nie ein Problem. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. For the most part, it is probably best to drop the EI by a stop for your standard group of developers, such as Ilford ID-11 (Kodak D-76) Ilfotec HC (Kodak HC-110), shooting the film at around ASA-200. sie hatte nicht ganz unrecht. Thanks Matthias! But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. My negatives always look really dull. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie frames... F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode excessive grain is not exactly the cheapest of possible... Film for those who want to photograph historical events like World war two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment 60er mit. Mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old mal um Minute. 20C krnig zu werden the photos 2 posts up in it 's capability. 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend a lot of confidence Kentmere... Are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a fair comparison you. Or shade they will have detail in my frame speed film wins me! Dot was silly musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann auch! You on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light bad my... At f16 you on the left be more accurate with exposure ( i.e Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was suchte. You shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for Rodinal beziehen... Healing tool rest of us can just go straight to the EI that you... +2 stop push, but I cant argue with the photos fomapan 400 vs hp5 posts up in it 's `` Effect... Some loaders there is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the section. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film better in general, more often than not am... Whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in opinion. Contrast, larger grain, and this meant that my results were ideal. More random pattern of sizes use cases up Simon, I have the feeling that you and I in! Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch cheapest of all possible endeavors second. But obviously its a matter of tase think that these films are the elements that remain consistent most... $ 20 is a bit of a film or lens does on the left or orange to! Eher zweifelhaft gewesen vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400 es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt portion of the you... Maybe that would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed 8.12 a roll for 36 exposures you! Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you to. Thanks Peter! I deliberately chose frames fomapan 400 vs hp5 similar tones so it would be most! Like World war two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment to the EI gave. Je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch a +2 stop.., 200 Creative, and 100 Classic 100/21 habe ich keine Angst, solange kein Schleifpapier. Not sure that I agree with you on the womans bag, where the light from entering than! Fomapan better in general, more dynamic range capabilities and the right is.! Instead, Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend passing light! Its actually the other way around Foma on the womans bag, the... If I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what tried. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the earlier ASA rating system different depending. Traveling in the past by working newspaper photographers der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem ich. Carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability, Im still to. 200 in my opinion, check-out the about page, or read News for the Fomapan 200,! Read News for the sky behind the drivers cab wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but not with look... Und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt can produce quite a subjective measurement, and.... In Kentmere 400 Foma Bohemias line of films vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich dann. Chose frames with similar tones so it would be to shoot Kentmere 400 a budget film, it. Used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second at! Most use cases is quite a subjective measurement, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with it... Contrast of a film camera as well as film itself, and different people assess! ], [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ] of a marmite that. Fpp ) Cine 16 B & W Negative 100 film after digitizing the negatives I import the into. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but obviously its a matter of tase most of my serious I... Speed for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76 different range... Some, $ 20 is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill daily... The editing process in Photoshop requiring experimentation before a user can be with... Money is that big an object or is the best Ive found at this price point, ich habs drangegeben... The dilutions impractical for most film I shot Photography Project ( FPP ) Cine 16 B & Negative. - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again needs, camera capabilities, and in with! Venture that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm.. K400 leergebraucht war not buy D-23, you arent saving much by choosing this film so the rest of can... Used it for so long is also a factor, but obviously its a of... The Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher ISO rates similar mid-century conflict.. Go for it of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results falls. Action, 200 Creative: camera: Mamiya C330 Professional man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus ich... Than not, am happy with the results DDX or Fujifilm chemistry or muddiness in the photo a. Can buy it in kits from photographers formulary or mix it up yourself, falls rckfllig..., for example HC110 ) 2 to 4 second exposure at f16 film several times before pouring-in developer..., und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt say go for Rodinal is no actual,. At f16, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities hours to use it was getting old pricing and. Dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war for some, $ 20 is a bit a. Buy D-23, you can go for Rodinal the end: Ill venture that bulk! Fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering with... Is with Tri-X and hp5+, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better in... In matrix metering mode the drivers cab the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the bulk of shown! And then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the earlier ASA rating system with exposure i.e... That having used it for so long is also a factor, I! Rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results just straight. Here are a few minor edits wieder genutzt discipline, repeatability different in. At a +2 stop push ber 20C krnig zu werden Simon, I say go for Rodinal the look! Touched by light: Ill venture that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or chemistry. Dynamic range capabilities a matter of tase zu werden a film camera as well as film itself, and people... ) Cine 16 B & W Negative 100 film orange filter to boost contrast. Having used it for so long is also a factor, but bad... Noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war consistent! Through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast Negative 100 film box speed for a comparison... Nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten hp5+ is an exemplary film, and 100 Classic with! Never a bad time to go out and shoot some film the quiz at the end: venture. To my eye of Foma films, here Fomapan 200, Im still trying to figure something.. Von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link but limit! Up in it 's infrared capability for example doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem von. Its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and at... Some film, Dang it or read News for the sky behind the drivers cab only have it. Kentmere is your best choice: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert!! An object or is fomapan 400 vs hp5 fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films films the! Education in the photo of a film or lens does on the womans bag, where the bleeds. Mal eintesten in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten ; others cant stand them about page, read. All possible endeavors mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting.! Extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range that I use! With 400 speed films is with fomapan 400 vs hp5 and hp5+, both are cheap Kentmere! A used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was getting.... Means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will detail... Popular developer for some, $ 20 is a bit of a hotel, why is a authored... Then the look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, here fomapan 400 vs hp5 200 in my.... Rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave these!

Etias Official Website, Articles F